Természettel való kapcsolat, életmód és bio-pszicho-szociális jóllét összefüggéseinek vizsgálata idősek körében
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Absztrakt
A természeti környezet és a természettel való kapcsolat egészségvédő szerepét számos kutatás vizsgálta már. Jelen kutatás célja a természettel való kapcsolat, az életmód, a mentális egészség és a testi tünetek komplex összefüggésrendszerének feltárása 60 év feletti személyek körében hálózatelemzési megközelítéssel.
A kérdőíves vizsgálatban 107 idős felnőtt vett részt. Az alkalmazott mérőeszközök a Mentális Egészség Teszt, a Természettel Való Viszony Skála rövid változata, egy fizikai tüneteket mérő skála, valamint az Egészséges Életmód Skála voltak. Az életkor kontrollálása mellett végzett korrelációs elemzések szerint a természettel való kapcsolat szignifikáns, pozitív összefüggést mutatott a mentális egészség több dimenziójával, valamint az egészséges életmód valamennyi vizsgált területével. A hálózatelemzés eredményei alapján a természettel való kapcsolat központi, protektív szerepet tölt be az életmódváltozók hálózatában, amelyek közvetett módon kapcsolódnak a mentális egészséghez és a testi tünetek alacsonyabb szintjéhez. Az életkor nem mutatott közvetlen kapcsolatot sem a mentális, sem a testi egészséggel, de közvetetten, az életmódon és a természetkapcsolaton keresztül kapcsolatban állt az egészségi változókkal.
Eredményeink alátámasztják a természeti környezethez való kapcsolódás komplex, rendszerszintű egészségvédő szerepét, és rámutatnak a természetalapú rekreáció jelentőségére az időskori jóllét előmozdításában.
Downloads
Article Details
Folyóirat szám
Rovat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Hogyan kell idézni
Hivatkozások
Akshayalakshmi, V. R., & Vinothkumar, M. (2024). Cognitive Flexibility as a Mediator Between Nature Relatedness and Emotion Appraisal Among Adolescents. Ecopsychology, 16(3), 219-228. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2023.0043
Aruta, J. J. B. R. (2023). The quest to mental well-being: Nature connectedness, materialism and the mediating role of meaning in life in the Philippine context. Current Psychology, 42(2), 1058-1069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01523-y
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497– 529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
Baxter, D., & Pelletier, L. G. (2019). Is nature relatedness a basic human psychological need? A critical examination of the extant literature. Canadian Psychology, 60(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000145
Baceviciene, M., & Jankauskiene, R. (2022). The mediating effect of nature restorativeness, stress level, and nature connectedness in the association between nature exposure and quality of life. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 2098. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042098
Basu, M., Hashimoto, S., & Dasgupta, R. (2020). The mediating role of place attachment between nature connectedness and human well-being: Perspectives from Japan. Sustainability Science, 15(3), 849-862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00765-x
Belényi, E. H., & Kondor, E. (2022). Természetjárás és időskor: nagyváradi idősekkel foglalkozó szervezetek jó gyakorlatai. Magyar Gerontológia, 14(Kulonszam), 66-67. https://doi.org/10.47225/mg/14/Kulonszam/12175
Bratman, G. N., Anderson, C. B., Berman, M. G., Cochran, B., de Vries, S., Flanders, J., ... & Daily, G. C. (2019). Nature and mental health: An ecosystem service perspective. Science Advances, 5(7), eaax0903. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax0903
Bratman, G. N., Mehta, A., Olvera-Alvarez, H., Spink, K. M., Levy, C., White, M. P., ... & Gross, J. J. (2024). Associations of nature contact with emotional ill-being and well-being: The role of emotion regulation. Cognition and Emotion, 38(5), 748-767. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2024.2316199
Capaldi, C. A., Passmore, H., Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Dopko, R. L. (2015). Flourishing in nature: A review of the benefits of connecting with nature and its application as a wellbeing intervention. International Journal of Wellbeing, 5(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v5i4.1
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
Epskamp, S., Borsboom, D., & Fried, E. I. (2018). Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), 195-212. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1
Epskamp, S., & Fried, E. I. (2018). A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. Psychological Methods, 23(4), 617-634. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000167
Epskamp, S., Kruis, J., & Marsman, M. (2017). Estimating psychopathological networks: Be careful what you wish for. PLOS ONE, 12(6), e0179891. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179891
Gawrych, M. (2024). Associations between nature connectedness and mental health-mediating effects of coping strategies. Archives of Psychiatry & Psychotherapy, 26(2). 10.12740/APP/174178
Gökkaya, D. (2025). Healthy Lifestyle Scale (Helis): A Scale Development Research. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 16(45, 53-68. https://doi.org/10.21076/vizyoner.1496574
Grahn, P., Ottosson, J., & Uvnäs-Moberg, K. (2021). The oxytocinergic system as a mediator of anti-stress and instorative effects induced by nature: The calm and connection theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 617814. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.617814
Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., De Vries, S., & Frumkin, H. (2014). Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35(1), 207-228. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443
Howell, A. J., Passmore, H. A., & Buro, K. (2013). Meaning in nature: Meaning in life as a mediator of the relationship between nature connectedness and well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(6), 1681-1696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9403-x
James, P., Hart, J. E., Banay, R. F., & Laden, F. (2016). Exposure to greenness and mortality in a nationwide prospective cohort study of women. Environmental Health Perspectives, 124(9), 1344-1352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1510363
Jenkins, M., Lee, C., Houge Mackenzie, S., Hargreaves, E. A., Hodge, K., & Calverley, J. (2022). Nature-based physical activity and hedonic and eudaimonic wellbeing: The mediating roles of motivational quality and nature relatedness. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 783840. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.783840
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Kondo, M. C., Oyekanmi, K. O., Gibson, A., South, E. C., Bocarro, J., & Hipp, J. A. (2020). Nature prescriptions for health: A review of evidence and research opportunities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(12), 4213. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124213
Köteles, F. (2017). A Természettel Való Viszony Skála rövid változatának pszichometriai elemzése és kérdőíves validálása. Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika, 18(4), 321-333. https://doi.org/10.1556/0406.18.2017.014
Kryazh, I. (2019). The positive effect of nature connectedness on psychological wellbeing: The significance of trust as a mediator. Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics, 16(1), 27-49.
Kövi, Z., Kim, H., Kamble, S., Mészáros, V., Lachance, D., & Nisbet, E. (2023). Cross-cultural validity of the Nature Relatedness Scale (NR-6) and links with wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v13i2.2841
Küçükaydın, M. A. (2024). Understanding connection to nature in Turkish middle school children: Personal factors and Nature's restorative effect. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 98, 102393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102393
Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M., & Michels, L. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 202-220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105284919
Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001
MacKerron, G., & Mourato, S. (2013). Happiness is greater in natural environments. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 992–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.010
Maxwell, S. E., & Cole, D. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 23-44. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.23
Moreira, P. A. S., Inman, R. A., Loureiro, A., Pedras, S., Faria, S., Araújo, M., ... & Araújo, D. (2022). Nature relatedness is a unidimensional construct: evidence from the Nature Relatedness Scale (NR-6). International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 22(2), 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2022.2085384
McNeil, D. G., Singh, A., & Chambers, T. (2022). Exploring nature-and social-connectedness as mediators of the relationship between nature-based exercise and subjective wellbeing. Ecopsychology, 14(4), 226-234. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2022.0013
Nisbet, E. K., & Zelenski, J. M. (2011). Underestimating nearby nature: Affective forecasting errors obscure the happy path to sustainability. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1101-1106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611418527
Nisbet, E. K., & Zelenski, J. M. (2013). The NR-6: A new brief measure of nature relatedness. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 813.
Nisbet, E. K., & Zelenski, J. M. (2013). The NR-6: A new brief measure of nature relatedness. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 813. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00813
Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2008). The nature relatedness scale. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 715–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508318748
Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2010). Happiness is in our Nature: Exploring Nature Relatedness as a Contributor to Subjective Well-Being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(2), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9197-7
Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Grandpierre, Z. (2019). Mindfulness in nature enhances connectedness and mood. Ecopsychology, 11(2), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2018.0061
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Ogletree, S. S., Huang, J. H., Reif, D., Yang, L., Dunstan, C., Osakwe, N., ... & Hipp, J. A. (2023). The relationship between greenspace exposure and telomere length in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Science of the Total Environment, 905 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167452
Princz, A. (2020). Civilben a munkahelyi egészségért. Hadtudományi Szemle, 13(1), 159-179. https://doi.org/10.32563/hsz.2020.1.12
Pritchard, A., Richardson, M., Sheffield, D., & McEwan, K. (2020). The relationship between nature connectedness and eudaimonic well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(3), 1145-1167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00118-6
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539-569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
Rohrer, J. M. (2018). Thinking clearly about correlations and causation: Graphical causal models for observational data. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917745629
Sadowski, I., Böke, N., Mettler, J., Heath, N., & Khoury, B. (2022). Naturally mindful? The role of mindfulness facets in the relationship between nature relatedness and subjective well-being. Current Psychology, 41(8), 5358-5373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01056-w
Sahak, S. M., Roslan, S., Ahmad, N., Mohamad, Z., & Ma’rof, A. M. (2024). Spirituality and nature connectedness as mediators between exposure to nature and psychological well-being of school students. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(5), 2346. https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i5.2346
Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8(4), 350-353. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.8.4.350
Shanahan, D. F., Bush, R., Gaston, K. J., Lin, B. B., Dean, J., Barber, E., & Fuller, R. A. (2016). Health benefits from nature experiences depend on dose. Scientific Reports, 6, 28551. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28551
Spector, P. E. (2019). Do not cross me: Optimizing the use of cross-sectional designs. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(2), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-09613-8
Spiliotopoulou, G. (2009). Reliability reconsidered: Cronbach's alpha and paediatric assessment in occupational therapy. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 56(3), 150-155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2009.00785.x
Supranowicz, P., & Paz, M. (2014). Holistic measurement of well-being: psychometric properties of the physical, mental and social well-being scale (PMSW-21) for adults. Roczniki Państwowego Zakładu Higieny, 65(3).
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach's alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Tessényi, J. (2024). Nyugdíjasok rekreációja és szabadidő felhasználásának időbeli összehasonlító elemzése [Recreation and Leisure Time Usage among Retirees: A Comparative Analysis Between 2016 and 2024]. Recreation, 14(3), 31-34. https://doi.org/10.21486/recreation.2024.14.3.6
Thompson, A., & Bruk-Lee, V. (2019). Naturally! Examining nature’s role in workplace strain reduction. Occupational Health Science, 3(1), 23-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41542-019-00033-5
Trigwell, J. L., Francis, A. J., & Bagot, K. L. (2014). Nature connectedness and eudaimonic well-being: Spirituality as a potential mediator. Ecopsychology, 6(4), 241-251. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2014.0025
Ulrich, R. S. (1981). Natural versus urban scenes: Some psychophysiological effects. Environment and Behavior, 13(5), 523-556.
Van den Berg, A. E., Maas, J., Verheij, R. A., & Groenewegen, P. P. (2010). Green space as a buffer between stressful life events and health. Social Science & Medicine, 70(8), 1203-1210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.002
Vargha, A., Zábó, V., Török, R., & Oláh, A. (2020). A jóllét és a mentális egészség mérése: a Mentális Egészség Teszt. Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika, 21(3), 281-322.
Williams, K., & Harvey, D. (2001). TRANSCENDENT EXPERIENCE IN FOREST ENVIRONMENTS. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0204
Wu, N., & Jones, C. (2022). The relationship between connectedness to nature and well-being: A meta-analysis. Curr. Res. Psychol. Behav. Sci, 3, 1064.
Yaffe, Y. (2018). Convergent validity and reliability of the Hebrew version of the Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire (PSDQ) in Hebrew-speaking Israeli-Arab families. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 12(2), 133-144. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v12i2.303